PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

The environmental effect of a manufacturing or service method is determined by the resource and energy inputs and outputs at each point of the product’s life cycle. In Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), generally, the material used for fabrication is plastic, and the raising of interest from different backgrounds of users could increase the issue of plastic pollution. Therefore, many scholars have proposed an initiative to employ bio-composite in FDM. In this study, an environmental assessment of global warming potential and fine particulate matter emission from the fabrication of bio-composite filament FDM was performed through its life cycle analysis using GaBi Software. Initially, data on resources and energy inputs and outputs were gathered. The functional unit in this study was the 1.0 kg wood/PLA composite filament extruded using a twin-screw extruder. All wastes were collected and recycled. The fabricated composite filaments were transported by container ship with a capacity of 5000 – 200 000 dwt gross weight for 100 km within Malaysia. Based on the results from the GaBi dashboard, the FDM process of bio-composite filament has contributed as much as 138.7 kg CO2 eq on the global warming potential and 1.71e-4 kg N eq. on fine particulate matter by the electricity power generation in extrusion and printing processes. The main factor for this issue is the consumption of coal in electric power generation, which is considered a non-renewable resource. Therefore, it is recommended that natural fibers such as wood fiber be employed in the filament of FDM to reduce the environmental impact. As shown in the study, the materials contribute less to the impact. Further study is suggested to compare the FDM technology with conventional technology using similar materials.

• Anderson, I. (2017). Mechanical properties of specimens 3D printed with virgin and recycled polylactic acid. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 4(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2016.0054

• Farcas, M. T., Mckinney, W., Qi, C., Mandler, K. W., Battelli, L., Friend, S. A., Stefaniak, A. B., Jackson, M., Orandle, M., Winn, A., Kashon, M., Lebouf, R. F., Russ, K. A., Hammond, D. R., Burns, D., Ranpara, A., Thomas, T. A., Matheson, J., Qian, Y., … & Commission, S. (2020). Pulmonary and systemic toxicity in rats following inhalation exposure of 3-D printer emissions from acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) filament Mariana. Inhalation Toxicology, 32(11-12), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958378.2020.1834034

• Herianto, Atsani, S. I., & Mastrisiswadi, H. (2020). Recycled polypropylene filament for 3D printer: Extrusion process parameter optimization. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 722(1), Article 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/722/1/012022

• Hopkins, N., Jiang, L., & Brooks, H. (2021). Energy consumption of common desktop additive manufacturing technologies. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 2, Article 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100068

• Khaki, S., Duffy, E., Smeaton, A. F., & Morrin, A. (2021). Monitoring of particulate matter emissions from 3D printing activity in the home setting. Sensors, 21(9), Article 3247. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093247

• Khosravani, M. R., & Reinicke, T. (2020). On the environmental impacts of 3D printing technology. Applied Materials Today, 20, Article 100689.

• Manoj, A., Bhuyan, M., Banik, S. R., & Sankar, M. R. (2021). Review on particle emissions during fused deposition modeling of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and polylactic acid polymers. Materials Today: Proceedings, 44, 1375–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.521

• Nyika, J., Mwema, F. M., Mahamood, R. M., Akinlabi, E. T., & Jen, T. C. (2022). Advances in 3D printing materials processing-environmental impacts and alleviation measures. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, 8(Sup3), 1275–1285. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2021.1945311

• Papong, S., Malakul, P., Trungkavashirakun, R., Wenunun, P., Chom-In, T., Nithitanakul, M., & Sarobol, E. (2014). Comparative assessment of the environmental profile of PLA and PET drinking water bottles from a life cycle perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.030

• Pinho, A. C., Amaro, A. M., & Piedade, A. P. (2020). 3D printing goes greener: Study of the properties of post-consumer recycled polymers for the manufacturing of engineering components. Waste Management, 118, 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.003

• Rashid, N. A. (2021, December 15). Power sector boosted by better demand for electricity. Bernama. https://www.bernama.com/en/business/news.php?id=2033764

• Stefaniak, A. B., Lebouf, R. F., Yi, J., Ham, J., Nurkewicz, T., Schwegler-Berry, D. E., Chen, B. T., Wells, J. R., Duling, M. G., Lawrence, R. B., Martin, S. B., Johnson, A. R., & Virji, M. A. (2017). Characterization of chemical contaminants generated by a desktop fused deposition modeling 3-dimensional printer. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 14(7), 540–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.1302589

• Suárez, L., & Domínguez, M. (2020). Sustainability and environmental impact of fused deposition modelling (FDM) technologies. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 106(3–4), 1267–1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04676-0

• Ulkir, O. (2023). Energy-consumption-based life cycle assessment of additive-Manufactured product with different types of materials. Polymers, 15(6), Article 1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061466

• Vlachopoulos, J., & Polychronopoulos, N. D. (2019). Understanding Rheology and Technology of Polymer Extrusion. Polydynamics Inc.

• Wojnowski, W., Kalinowska, K., Majchrzak, T., & Zabiegała, B. (2022). Real-time monitoring of the emission of volatile organic compounds from polylactide 3D printing filaments. Science of the Total Environment, 805, Article 150181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150181

• Wojtyła, S., Klama, P., & Baran, T. (2017). Is 3D printing safe? Analysis of the thermal treatment of thermoplastics: ABS, PLA, PET, and nylon. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 14(6), D80–D85. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.1285489

• Yi, J., LeBouf, R. F., Duling, M. G., Nurkiewicz, T., Chen, B. T., Schwegler-Berry, D., Virji, M. A., & Stefaniak, A. B. (2016). Emission of particulate matter from a desktop three-dimensional (3D) printer. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues, 79(11), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2016.1166467

• Zhang, Q., Wong, J. P. S., Davis, A. Y., Black, M. S., & Weber, R. J. (2017). Characterization of particle emissions from consumer fused deposition modeling 3D printers. Aerosol Science and Technology, 51(11), 1275–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1342029

• Zhou, Y., Kong, X., Chen, A., & Cao, S. (2015). Investigation of ultrafine particle emissions of desktop 3D printers in the clean room. Procedia Engineering, 121, 506–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1099