Home / Regular Issue / JSSH Vol. 29 (4) Dec. 2021 / JSSH-8183-2021

 

Disciplinary Power, Surveillance, and the Docile Body in Mark Dunn’s Ella Minnow Pea

Hasanain Riyadh Abdulzahra, Zainor Izat Zainal, Mohamed Ewan Awang and Hardev Kaur Jujar Singh

Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, Volume 29, Issue 4, December 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.4.31

Keywords: Disciplinary power, docile body, Ella Minnow Pea , Foucault, surveillance

Published on: 13 December 2021

Power in contemporary society is a prominent feature in literary works, especially in postmodernist literary works. Mark Dunn is an American novelist who deals with the subject of power prominently in his works, especially his first novel Ella Minnow Pea (2001). While previous studies on Dunn’s Ella Minnow Pea focused on aspects of violence, sexuality, and psychological aspects of power, this study concentrates on disciplinary aspects of power, such as surveillance, which is used to subjugate subjects without the use of violence to transform them into productive, docile bodies. The study explores Ella Minnow Pea through Foucault’s concept of disciplinary power, surveillance, and docile body. In Foucault’s view, disciplinary power is used as a conversion method to force individuals into submission to authority characterised by conformity and obedience, or docility. The study examines power manipulation, disciplinary practices, and the effectiveness of surveillance as methods for converting people into productive docile bodies and how the novel achieved this result. In addition, it delves into the characters’ responses in the novel to these machinations, which ultimately reveal that the negative impacts of repressive disciplinary power contrast with the benefits anticipated by the authoritarian state. This study provides a valuable insight on the use of Foucauldian concepts in literary criticism as the concepts chosen for this analysis have not previously been applied to this text.

  • Anderson, C., Goldsworthy, B., & MacQueen, L. (2016). Finding community in young adult literature. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149x.2154

  • Bauer, M. (2018). Self-imposed fetters: The productivity of formal and thematic restrictions. Connotations: A Journal for Critical Debate, 27, 1-18. http://www.connotations.de/debate/fetters

  • Bourke, T., Lidstone, J., & Ryan, M. (2013). Schooling teachers: Professionalism or disciplinary power? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(1), 84-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.839374

  • Charles, R. (2001, October 4). Political satire missing letters, but not wit. The Christian Science Monitor. https://www.csmonitor.com/2001/1004/p19s1-bogn.html

  • Doolin, B. (1998). Information technology as disciplinary technology: Being critical in interpretive research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 13(4), 301-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/026839629801300408

  • Dunn, M. (2002). Ella Minnow Pea: A novel in letters. Anchor.

  • Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.

  • Foucault, M. (2008). Psychiatric power: Lectures at the collège de France, 1973–1974 (Vol. 1). Macmillan.

  • Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and writings 1972-1977. Harvester.

  • Isik, D. (2020). A Foucauldian reading of DAVE Eggers’s the circle. Modernism and Postmodernism Studies Network, 1(2), 154-162. https://doi.org/10.47333/modernizm.2020265884

  • Leitch, V. B., Cain, W. E., Finke, L., McGowan, J., Sharpley-Whiting, T. D., & Williams, J. (2018). The Norton anthology of theory and criticism. W.W. Norton & Company.

  • Lorber, S. (2016). Paper Lorber. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/36923907/Paper_Lorber

  • Malin, I. (2003). Ella minnow pea: A novel in letters. Review of Contemporary Fiction, 23(2), 1-53.

  • Manley, A., Palmer, C., & Roderick, M. (2012). Disciplinary power, the Oligopticon and rhizomatic surveillance in elite sports academies. Surveillance & Society, 10(3/4), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v10i3/4.4281

  • Rook, O. (2016). Surveillance, regulation and selfhood in George Orwell’s 1984 (1949) and Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale (1985). In Innervate Leading Student Work in English Studies (Vol. 8; pp. 14-28). University of Nottingham. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/english/documents/innervate/15-16/02-olivia-rook-q33407-pp-14-28.pdf

  • Tian, S. (2018). George Orwell’s 1984 and Peter Weir’s The Truman Show under the perspective of Michel Foucault. Journal of Artistic Creation and Literary Research, 6(2), 48-64. https://www.ucm.es/siim/journal-of-artistic-creation-and-literary-research

ISSN 0128-7702

e-ISSN 2231-8534

Article ID

JSSH-8183-2021

Download Full Article PDF

Share this article

Related Articles