PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE

J

• Alfahad, A. (2016). Equivocation in Arabic news interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(2), 206-223. http://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15579126

• Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullet, J. (1988). Political equivocation: A situational explanation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7(2), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8800700204

• Bull, P. (1994). On identifying questions, replies, and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(2), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94132002

• Bull, P. (2008). “Slipperiness, evasion, and ambiguity” equivocation and facework in noncommittal political discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(4), 333-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322475

• Bull, P., & Fetzer, A. (2006). Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. Text and Talk, 26(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.002

• Bull, P., & Fetzer, A. (2010). Face, facework and political discourse. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 23(2), 155-185.

• Bull, P., Fetzer, A., & Kádár, D. Z. (2020). Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’: The strategic use of ritual references to the Speaker of the UK House of Commons. Pragmatics, 30(1), 64-87. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19020.bul

• Bull, P., & Mayer, K. (1993). How not to answer questions in political interviews. Political Psychology, 14(4), 651-666. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791379

• Bull, P., & Strawson, W. (2020). Can’t answer? Won’t answer? An analysis of equivocal responses by Theresa May in Prime Minister’s Questions. Parliamentary Affairs, 73(2), 429-449. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsz003

• Carranza, A. V. (2016). Evading and resisting answering: An analysis of Mexican Spanish news interviews. Pragmatics and Society, 7(4), 570-594. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.4.03car

• Chovanec, J. (2020). “Those are not my words”: Evasion and metalingual accountability in political scandal talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 158, 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.003

• Clayman, S. E. (2001). Answers and evasions. Language in Society, 30(3), 403-442. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501003037

• Clayman, S. E. (2012). Conversation analysis in the news interview context. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 630-656). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch31

• Dillon, J. T. (1990). The practice of questioning. Taylor & Francis.

• Feldman, O. (2020). The rhetoric of broadcast talk shows in Japan: The art of equivocation as a political skill. In O. Feldman (Ed.), The rhetoric of political leadership: Logic and emotion in public discourse (pp. 139-155). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789904581.00016

• Feldman, O., & Kinoshita, K. (2017). Expanding factors in threat to face: Assessing the toughness/equivocation connection in Japanese televised political interviews. Language and Dialogue, 7(3), 336-359. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.3.02fel

• Feldman, O., Kinoshita, K., & Bull, P. (2016). ‘Ducking and diving’: How political issues affect equivocation in Japanese political interviews. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 17(2), 141-167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109916000013

• Fetzer, A. (2006). “Minister, we will see how the public judges you”: Media references in political interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(2), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.017

• Gnisci, A. (2021). Pragmatic functions of question-answer sequences in Italian legal examinations and TV interviews with politicians. In C. Ilie (Ed.), Questioning and answering practices across contexts and cultures (pp. 115-150). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

• Gnisci, A., & Bonaiuto, M. (2003). Grilling politicians: Politicians’ answers to questions in television interviews and courtroom examinations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(4), 385-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X03258088

• Goddard, C. (1994). The meaning of Lah: Understanding” emphasis” in Malay (Bahasa Melayu). Oceanic Linguistics, 145-165. https://doi.org/10.2307/3623004

• Goss, B., & Williams, L. (1973). The effects of equivocation on perceived source credibility. Communication Studies, 24(3), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510977309363165

• Guditus, C. L. (2021). You were resisting the whole time! In C. Ilie (Ed.), Questioning and answering practices across contexts and cultures (pp. 151-170). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

• Hamilton, M. A., & Mineo, P. J. (1998). A framework for understanding equivocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17(1), 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X980171001

• Hanafe, N. Z. (2016). Evasion strategies by politicians in news interviews. [Master’s thesis, Universiti Malaya]. Universiti Malaya’s Students’ Repository. http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/id/eprint/6812

• Haugh, M. (2016). “Just kidding”: Teasing and claims to non-serious intent. Journal of Pragmatics, 95, 120-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.004

• Heritage, J. (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10-11), 1427-1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3

• Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481311434763

• Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90004-3

• Ilie, C. (2015). Parliamentary discourse. In K. Tracy (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1113-1127). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi201

• Ilie, C. (2021). Evasive answers vs. aggressive questions. In Questioning and answering practices across contexts and cultures (pp. 35-70). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

• Jalilifar, A., & Alavi-Nia, M. (2012). We are surprised; wasn’t Iran disgraced there? A functional analysis of hedges and boosters in televised Iranian and American presidential debates. Discourse & Communication, 6(2), 135-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481311434763

• Kantara, A. (2012). Adversarial challenges and responses in Greek political interviews: A case study. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 5(2), 171-189.

• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.

• Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Sage Publications.

• Penyata Rasmi Parlimen Dewan Rakyat (Bil. 20 DR-13082018) [House of Representatives Parliamentary Hansards]. (2018a). Parlimen Malaysia. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/files/hindex/pdf/DR-13082018.pdf

• Penyata Rasmi Parlimen Dewan Rakyat (Bil. 20 DR-14082018) [House of Representatives Parliamentary Hansards]. (2018b). Parlimen Malaysia. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/files/hindex/pdf/DR-14082018.pdf

• Penyata Rasmi Parlimen Dewan Rakyat (Bil. 20 DR-15082018) [House of Representatives Parliamentary Hansards]. (2018c). Parlimen Malaysia. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/files/hindex/pdf/DR-15082018.pdf

• Penyata Rasmi Parlimen Dewan Rakyat (Bil. 20 DR-16082018) [House of Representatives Parliamentary Hansards]. (2018d). Parlimen Malaysia. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/files/hindex/pdf/DR-16082018.pdf

• Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2005). Managing adversarial questioning in broadcast interviews. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(2), 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.193

• Rasiah, P. (2007). Evasion in Australia’s parliamentary question time: The case of the Iraq war. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Australia]. UWA Repository. https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/evasion-in-australias-parliamentary-question-time-the-case-of-the

• Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M. (2008). “Those are only slogans”: A linguistic analysis of argumentation in debates with extremist political speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(4), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322476

• Uni, K. (2015). Utilising Arabic-origin loanwords in teaching Malay as a foreign language. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23(3), 665-680.

• Wan Jan, W. S. (2020). Parti Islam Semalaysia (PAS): Unifier of the ummah? ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814951265

• Yoke, S. K., & Hasan, N. H. (2014). Analogy as a tool for the acquisition of English verb tenses among low proficiency L2 learners. English Language Teaching, 7(4), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n4p46

• Yoong, D. (2011). Orderly and disorderly practices of personal pronouns during Question Time in the Malaysian House of Representatives. Journal of Modern Languages, 21(1), 33-47.

• Zulli, D., & McKasy, M. (2020). Political equivocation in a less-adversarial campaign context. Communication Research Reports, 37(4), 202-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2020.1811659

• Alfahad, A. (2016). Equivocation in Arabic news interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(2), 206-223. http://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15579126

• Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullet, J. (1988). Political equivocation: A situational explanation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7(2), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8800700204

• Bull, P. (1994). On identifying questions, replies, and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(2), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94132002

• Bull, P. (2008). “Slipperiness, evasion, and ambiguity” equivocation and facework in noncommittal political discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(4), 333-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322475

• Bull, P., & Fetzer, A. (2006). Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. Text and Talk, 26(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.002

• Bull, P., & Fetzer, A. (2010). Face, facework and political discourse. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 23(2), 155-185.

• Bull, P., Fetzer, A., & Kádár, D. Z. (2020). Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’: The strategic use of ritual references to the Speaker of the UK House of Commons. Pragmatics, 30(1), 64-87. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19020.bul

• Bull, P., & Mayer, K. (1993). How not to answer questions in political interviews. Political Psychology, 14(4), 651-666. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791379

• Bull, P., & Strawson, W. (2020). Can’t answer? Won’t answer? An analysis of equivocal responses by Theresa May in Prime Minister’s Questions. Parliamentary Affairs, 73(2), 429-449. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsz003

• Carranza, A. V. (2016). Evading and resisting answering: An analysis of Mexican Spanish news interviews. Pragmatics and Society, 7(4), 570-594. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.4.03car

• Chovanec, J. (2020). “Those are not my words”: Evasion and metalingual accountability in political scandal talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 158, 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.003

• Clayman, S. E. (2001). Answers and evasions. Language in Society, 30(3), 403-442. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501003037

• Clayman, S. E. (2012). Conversation analysis in the news interview context. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 630-656). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch31

• Dillon, J. T. (1990). The practice of questioning. Taylor & Francis.

• Feldman, O. (2020). The rhetoric of broadcast talk shows in Japan: The art of equivocation as a political skill. In O. Feldman (Ed.), The rhetoric of political leadership: Logic and emotion in public discourse (pp. 139-155). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789904581.00016

• Feldman, O., & Kinoshita, K. (2017). Expanding factors in threat to face: Assessing the toughness/equivocation connection in Japanese televised political interviews. Language and Dialogue, 7(3), 336-359. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.3.02fel

• Feldman, O., Kinoshita, K., & Bull, P. (2016). ‘Ducking and diving’: How political issues affect equivocation in Japanese political interviews. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 17(2), 141-167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109916000013

• Fetzer, A. (2006). “Minister, we will see how the public judges you”: Media references in political interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(2), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.017

• Gnisci, A. (2021). Pragmatic functions of question-answer sequences in Italian legal examinations and TV interviews with politicians. In C. Ilie (Ed.), Questioning and answering practices across contexts and cultures (pp. 115-150). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

• Gnisci, A., & Bonaiuto, M. (2003). Grilling politicians: Politicians’ answers to questions in television interviews and courtroom examinations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(4), 385-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X03258088

• Goddard, C. (1994). The meaning of Lah: Understanding” emphasis” in Malay (Bahasa Melayu). Oceanic Linguistics, 145-165. https://doi.org/10.2307/3623004

• Goss, B., & Williams, L. (1973). The effects of equivocation on perceived source credibility. Communication Studies, 24(3), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510977309363165

• Guditus, C. L. (2021). You were resisting the whole time! In C. Ilie (Ed.), Questioning and answering practices across contexts and cultures (pp. 151-170). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

• Hamilton, M. A., & Mineo, P. J. (1998). A framework for understanding equivocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17(1), 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X980171001

• Hanafe, N. Z. (2016). Evasion strategies by politicians in news interviews. [Master’s thesis, Universiti Malaya]. Universiti Malaya’s Students’ Repository. http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/id/eprint/6812

• Haugh, M. (2016). “Just kidding”: Teasing and claims to non-serious intent. Journal of Pragmatics, 95, 120-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.004

• Heritage, J. (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10-11), 1427-1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3

• Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481311434763

• Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90004-3

• Ilie, C. (2015). Parliamentary discourse. In K. Tracy (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1113-1127). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi201

• Ilie, C. (2021). Evasive answers vs. aggressive questions. In Questioning and answering practices across contexts and cultures (pp. 35-70). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

• Jalilifar, A., & Alavi-Nia, M. (2012). We are surprised; wasn’t Iran disgraced there? A functional analysis of hedges and boosters in televised Iranian and American presidential debates. Discourse & Communication, 6(2), 135-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481311434763

• Kantara, A. (2012). Adversarial challenges and responses in Greek political interviews: A case study. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 5(2), 171-189.

• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.

• Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Sage Publications.

• Penyata Rasmi Parlimen Dewan Rakyat (Bil. 20 DR-13082018) [House of Representatives Parliamentary Hansards]. (2018a). Parlimen Malaysia. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/files/hindex/pdf/DR-13082018.pdf

• Penyata Rasmi Parlimen Dewan Rakyat (Bil. 20 DR-14082018) [House of Representatives Parliamentary Hansards]. (2018b). Parlimen Malaysia. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/files/hindex/pdf/DR-14082018.pdf

• Penyata Rasmi Parlimen Dewan Rakyat (Bil. 20 DR-15082018) [House of Representatives Parliamentary Hansards]. (2018c). Parlimen Malaysia. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/files/hindex/pdf/DR-15082018.pdf

• Penyata Rasmi Parlimen Dewan Rakyat (Bil. 20 DR-16082018) [House of Representatives Parliamentary Hansards]. (2018d). Parlimen Malaysia. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/files/hindex/pdf/DR-16082018.pdf

• Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2005). Managing adversarial questioning in broadcast interviews. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(2), 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.193

• Rasiah, P. (2007). Evasion in Australia’s parliamentary question time: The case of the Iraq war. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Australia]. UWA Repository. https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/evasion-in-australias-parliamentary-question-time-the-case-of-the

• Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M. (2008). “Those are only slogans”: A linguistic analysis of argumentation in debates with extremist political speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(4), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322476

• Uni, K. (2015). Utilising Arabic-origin loanwords in teaching Malay as a foreign language. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23(3), 665-680.

• Wan Jan, W. S. (2020). Parti Islam Semalaysia (PAS): Unifier of the ummah? ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814951265

• Yoke, S. K., & Hasan, N. H. (2014). Analogy as a tool for the acquisition of English verb tenses among low proficiency L2 learners. English Language Teaching, 7(4), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n4p46

• Yoong, D. (2011). Orderly and disorderly practices of personal pronouns during Question Time in the Malaysian House of Representatives. Journal of Modern Languages, 21(1), 33-47.

• Zulli, D., & McKasy, M. (2020). Political equivocation in a less-adversarial campaign context. Communication Research Reports, 37(4), 202-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2020.1811659