The study of juncture in the perspective of the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context is limited, particularly to the one associated with the recalling process. This research aims to describe a glimpse of the juncture phenomenon by indicating the phonetic recalling process. An experimental method was applied to conduct the research. An experiment involving stimuli to phonetic knowledge was given to participants in the EFL context. There were twenty students involved in this experimental study. Analysed acoustically, the result of the preliminary data shows that junctures may occur during speech production of the stimuli with the indication of the phonetic recalling process at the syllabic level. This indication might refer to the participants’ attempt to re-access the phonetic knowledge stored in the brain. The pause duration might mark the occurrence of junctures, indicating phonetic recalling. It was also revealed that the participants’ attitudes towards the English might influence the occurrence of junctures. The study showed that junctures happened before pronouncing the words in monosyllabic words. In contrast, juncture might occur in the first, middle, and last syllable in multisyllabic words. The locations of junctures might relate to the most unfamiliar syllable of the words from the participants’ perspective. From this perspective, juncture may also occur in other speakers, not only Sundanese but also other foreign languages, not only English. This preliminary research may serve as a foundation to conduct a relevant study on the other local or regional languages in Indonesia.

• Albury, N. J. (2021). Linguistic landscape and metalinguistic talk about societal multilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(2), 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1452894

• Alfarisy, F. (2021). Kebijakan pembelajaran bahasa Inggris di Indonesia dalam perspektif pembentukan warga dunia dengan kompetensi antarbudaya [English learning policy in Indonesia in the perspective of world citizen building with intercultural competence]. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 6(3), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v6i3.207

• Amin, H. U., & Malik, A. S. (2014). Memory retention and recall process. In N. Kamel & A. S. Malik (Eds.), EEG/ERP Analysis (pp. 219-237). CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17605-14

• Amin, H. U., Malik, A. S., Badruddin, N., & Chooi, W. T. (2014). Brain behavior in learning and memory recall process: A high-resolution eeg analysis. In J. Goh (Ed.), The 15th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering 2014 (pp. 683-686). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02913-9_174

• Ari, S. L., Dodsworth, R., Mielke, J., & Peperkamp, S. (2019). The different roles of expectations in phonetic and lexical processing. Interspeech 2019, 2305-2309. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2019-1795

• Arifuddin. (2013). Neuropsikolinguistik [Neuropsycholinguistics]. Rajawali Press.

• Baker, W. (2005). The interaction of the bilingual’s two phonetic systems: Differences in early and late Korean-English bilinguals. In J. Cohen, K. T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, & J. MacSwan (Eds.), ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism (pp. 45-63). Cascadilla Press.

• Bolton, K., Bacon-Shone, J., & Lee, S. L. (2020). Societal multilingualism in Hong Kong. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429463860-12

• Boomer, D. S. (1965). Hesitation and grammatical encoding. Language and Speech, 8(3), 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096500800302

• Boumeester, M., Michel, C. M., & Fyndanis, V. (2019). Sequential multilingualism and cognitive abilities: Preliminary data on the contribution of language proficiency and use in different modalities. Behavioral Sciences, 9(92), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9090092

• Cenoz, J. (2013). Defining multilingualism. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026719051300007x

• Chik, A., & Melo-Pfeifer, S. (2023). Do societal and individual multilingualism lead to positive perceptions of multilingualism and language learning? A comparative study with Australian and German pre-service teachers. Language Awareness. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2023.2234288

• Clay, M. M., & Imlach, R. H. (1971). Juncture, pitch, and stress as reading behavior variables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(2), 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80004-X

• Cohn, A. C., & Ravindranath, M. (2014). Local languages in Indonesian: Language maintenance or language shift? Linguistik Indonesia, 32(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v32i2.22

• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publication.

• Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetic (6th ed.). Blackwell Publishing.

• Demirezen, M. (2013). Sustained juncture in teaching spoken English: Application by computer in teacher education. H. U. Journal of Education, 1, 109-120.

• Demirezen, M. (2019). The phonological structure of open and close junctures in utterances for English teachers. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 11(1), 197-208.

• Erickson, D., Mattingly, I. G., & Turvey, M. T. (1977). Phonetic activity in reading: An experiment with kanji. Language and Speech, 20(4), 384-403. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097702000410

• Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357-1392. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00006.2011

• Friederici, A. D., & Wartenburger, I. (2010). Language and brain. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1(2), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.9

• Greenberg, S., Carvey, H., Hitchcock, L., & Chang, S. (2002). Beyond the phoneme: A juncture-accent model of spoken language. In HLT ‘02: Proceedings of the second international conference on Human Language Technology Research (pp. 36-43). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3115/1289189.1289251

• Halim, A. (1971). Multilingualism in relation to the development of bahasa Indonesia. RELC Journal, 2(2), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368827100200202

• Hamid, B. A., Yee, C. J., & Ibrahim, H. M. (2022). Acoustic analysis of voicing contrast in Malay word-initial plosives produced by Mandarin-speaking children. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 30(4), 1673-1689. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.4.11

• Hawkins, S. (2003). Roles and representations of systemic fine phonetics detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics, 31(3), 373-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2003.09.006

• Heselwood, B. C., Bray, M., & Crookston, I. (1995). Juncture, rhythm and planning in the speech of an adult with down’s syndrome. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 9(2), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209508985328

• Hoard, J. E. (1966). Juncture and syllable structure in English. Phonetica, 15(2), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.1159/000258541

• Hu, X., Ackermann, H., Martin, J. A., Erb, M., Winkler, S., & Reiterer, S. M. (2013). Language aptitude for pronunciation in advanced second language (L2) learners: Behavioural predictors and neural substrates. Brian & Language, 127(3), 366-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.11.006

• Ibrahim, W. J. (2008). English and Arabic juncture. College of Basic Education Researchers Journal, 8(1), 353-368.

• Kaharuddin, & Ahmad, D. (2018). English phonetics for Indonesian learners of English (An essential guide to natural English pronunciation). TrustMedia Publishing.

• Lauder, A. (2008). The status and function of English in Indonesia: A review of key factors. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 12(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v12i1.128

• Lin, Y. C., Chen, H. Y., Lai, Y. C., & Wu, D. H. (2015). Phonological similarity and orthographic similarity affect probed serial recall of Chinese characters. Memory & Cognition, 43(3), 538-554. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0495-x

• Malechová, M. (2016). Multilingualism as a sociolinguistic contact phenomenon with regard to current forms of multilingual communication code-switching as one of the contemporary communication trends. Informatol, 49(1-2), 86-93.

• Markowitsch, H. J. (1995). Which brain regions are critically involved in the retrieval of old episodic memory? Brain Research Reviews, 21(2), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(95)00007-0

• Matthews, P. H. (1997). The concise English dictionary of linguistics. Oxford University Press.

• Pajak, B., Creel, S. C., & Levy, R. (2016). Difficulty in learning similar-sounding words: A developmental stage or a general property of learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(9), 1377-1399. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000247

• Peng, S. (2019). A study of the differences between EFL and ESL for English classroom teaching in China. IRA International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies, 15(1), 32-35. https://doi.org/10.21013/jems.v15.n1.p4

• Perwitasari, A., Klamer, M., & Schiller, N. O. (2016). Formant frequencies and vowel space area in Javanese and Sundanese English language learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2016-2203-10

• Pisoni, D. B. (1973). Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels. Perception & Psychophysics, 13(2), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214136

• Priya, S., & Singh, R. (2017). Language acquisition of Korean children in an Indian multilingual society. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, IX(1), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v9n1.27

• Rasman, R. (2018). To translanguage or not to translanguage? The multilingual practice in Indonesian EFL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 687-694. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9819

• Redford, M. A., & Randall, P. K. (2005). The role of juncture cues and phonological knowledge in English syllabification judgements. Journal of Phonetics, 33(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.05.003

• Risdianto, F. (2017). A phonological analysis on the English consonants of Sundanese EFL speakers. Jurnal Arbitrer, 4(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.4.1.27-37.2017

• Riza, H. (2008). Resources report on languages of Indonesia. International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 93-94.

• Sedeng, I. N. (2016). Juncture models a cross-linguistic typology. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 21(12), 1-11.

• Setter, J., Mok, P, Low E. L., Zuo, D., & Ao, R. (2014). Word juncture characteristics in world Englishes: A research report. World Englishes, 33(2), 278-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12085

• Sheard, E. (2019). Variation, language ideologies and stereotypes: Orientations towards like and youse in western and northern Sydney. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 39(4), 485-510. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2019.1641066

• Shimizu, K., & Dantsuji, M. (1980). A study on perception of internal juncture in Japanese. Studia Phonologica, 14, 1-15.

• Shinozuka, K., Niioka, K., Tokuda, T., Kyutoku, Y., Okuno, K., Takahashi, T., & Dan, I. (2021). Language familiarity and proficiency leads to differential cortical processing during translation between distantly related languages. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.593108

• Soni, M. (2018). Sundanese language interference in pronouncing English fricative and affricate consonants. EEAL Journal (English Education and Applied Linguistics), 1(1), 92-98.

• Stein-Smith, K. (2021). Multilingualism for global solutions and a better world. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(5), 671-677. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1205.05

• Sudaryat, Y., Prawirasumantri, A., & Yudibrata, K. (2013). Tata basa Sunda kiwari [Contemporary Sundanese grammar]. Yrama Widya.

• Syahrin, E. (2014). Deskripsi fonotaktik bahasa Sunda [The description of Sundanese phonotactic]. Jurnal Bahas, 89, 77-87.

• Trask, R. L. (1996). A dictionary of phonetics and phonology. Routledge.

• Tsukada, K. (2019). Are Asian language speaker similar or different? The perception of Mandarin lexical tones by naȉve listeners from tonal language backgrounds: A preliminary comparison of Thai and Vietnamese listeners. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 39(3), 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2019.1620681

• Wade, T., & Mobius, B. (2010). Detailed phonetic memory for multi-word and part-word sequences. Laboratory Phonology, 1(2), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2010.014

• Wibisono, D. F., Hartanto, W., & Murniati, C. T. (2004). Familiarity of words in the production of the correct pronunciation: Helpful or not. Celt, 4(1), 47-55.

• Widiati, U., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2006). The teaching of EFL speaking in the Indonesian context: The state of the art. Bahasa dan Seni, 34(2), 269-292.

• Zacharias, N. T. (2012). EFL students’ understanding of their multilingual English identities. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(2), 233-244.

• Zarobe, L. R., & Zarobe, Y. R. (2015). New perspectives on multilingualism and L2 acquisition: An introduction. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(4), 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2015.1071021

• Zein, S. (2019). English, multilingualism and globalisation in Indonesia. A love triangle: Why Indonesia should move towards multilingual education. English Today, 35(1), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026607841800010x

• Zen, E. L. (2018). A preliminary evidence of transfer in the acquisition of sentential negation of English in multilingual Indonesian children in school context. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(3), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2018-2403-12

• Zhang, J. (2019). Cognitive functions of the brain: Perception, attention and memory. IFM Lab Tutorial Series. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.02863