PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

J

• Ackoff, R. L., & Emery, F. E. (1972). On purposeful systems: An interdisciplinary analysis of individual and social behavior as a system of purposeful events. Aldine-Atherton.

• Alekseev, V. V., Borodkin, L. I., Korotaev, A. V., Malinetskii, G. G., Podlazov, A. V., Malkov, S. Y., & Turchin, P. V. (2007). Mezhdunarodnaja konferencija “Matematicheskoe modelirovanie istoricheskih processov” [International conference ‘Mathematical modeling of historical processes’]. Vestnik Rossijskogo fonda fundamental’nyh issledovanij, (6), 37-47. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17906233

• Avrech, A. L. (2015). Hrushhev i Tambovshhina. Podrobnaja istorija kukuruzofikacii Tambovskoj oblasti (Tom 2) [Khrushchev and Tambov: A detailed history of cornification in the Tambov region (Vol. 2)]. Chesnokov Publishing House.

• Axelrod, R. (2007). Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. In J.-P. Rennard (Ed.), Handbook of research on nature inspired computing for economics and management (pp. 90-100). IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-984-7.ch007

• Borodkin, L. I. (2005). Metodologija analiza neustojchivyh sostojanij v politiko-istoricheskih processah [Methods of complexity science in political history studies]. Mezhdunarodnye Processy, 3(7), 4-16. http://www.intertrends.ru/system/Doc/ArticlePdf/127/Borodkin-07.pdf

• Borodkin, L. I. (2016). Modelirovanie istoricheskih processov: Ot rekonstrukcii real’nosti k analizu al’ternativ [Modeling of historical processes: From the reconstruction of reality to the analysis of alternatives]. Aletheia.

• Borodkin, L. I. (2019). Vyzovy nestabil’nosti: Koncepcii sinergetiki v izuchenii istoricheskogo razvitija Rossii [Challenges of instability: Synergetic concepts in the study of the historical development of Russia]. Ural’skij Istoricheskij Vestnik, (2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2019-2(63)-127-136

• Bykova, V. I., & Schukin, Y. K. (2004). Medicinskaja pomoshh’ v Tambovskoj oblasti: spravochnik [Medical service in the Tambov region: A reference book]. PS.

• Kamensky V. I. (Ed.). (1989). Sel’skie naselennye punkty Tambovskoj oblasti po dannym Vsesojuznoj perepisi naselenija 1989 g. Statisticheskij sbornik [Rural settlements of the Tambov region according to the 1989 all-union population census: Statistical collection]. TOSU.

• Kanishchev, V. V. (2016). Demograficheskij perehod v rossijskom agrarnom obshhestve vtoroj poloviny XIX – pervoj treti XX v. Sovremennye metody issledovanija [The demographic transition in the Russian agricultural society of the late 19th – the first third of the 20th century: Modern research methods]. Ezhegodnik po agrarnoj istorii Vostochnoj Evropy, (1), 210-223. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29791445

• Malinetskii, G. G. (2013). Chudo samoorganizovannoj kritichnosti [The miracle of self-organized criticality]. In P. Bak (Auth.), Kak rabotaet priroda: eorija samoorganizovannoj kritichnosti (pp. 13-56). URSS.

• Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). The Fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman and Company.

• Marshall, A. (1890). 1920. Principles of economics. Mac-Millan.

• Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems, A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.

• Morgan, D. H. J. (1989). Strategies and sociologists: A comment on crow. Sociology, 23(1), 25-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038589023001003

• Muravyov, N. V. (1988). Iz istorii vozniknovenija i razvitija obshheobrazovatel’nyh shkol Tambovskoj oblasti [From the history of the emergence and development of secondary schools in the Tambov region]. Central Black Soil Publishing House.

• Peña, F. M., & Azpilicueta, M. P. E. (2003). Existen estrategias demográficas colectivas? Algunas reflexiones basadas en el modelo demográfico de baja presión de la Navarra cantábrica en los siglos XVIII y XIX [Are there collective demographic strategies? Some reflections based on the demographic model of decompression in Cantabrian Navarre, 18th and 19th centuries.]. Revista de Demografía Histórica, 21(2), 13-58. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=857540

• Pertsev, V. A. (2013). Material’noe polozhenie naselenija RSFSR (vtoraja polovina 1950-h – 1980-e gg.) [The material situation of the population of the RSFSR (the latter half of the 1950s–1980s)]. VSU.

• Piskunov, S. A. (2017). Gosudarstvennaja politika sel’skohozjajstvennogo pereselenija i ee realizacija na territorii RSFSR (2-ja polovina 1940 – 1980-e gg.) [State policy for agricultural resettlement and its implementation on the territory of the RSFSR (the latter half of the 1940s–1980s); Doctoral dissertation]. Tambov State University. https://dlib.rsl.ru/01009439303

• Polyakov, Y. A. (Ed.). (2011). Naselenie Rossii v XX veke: Istoricheskie ocherki, 1980–1990 [The population of Russia in the XX century: Historical essays, 1980–1990]. ROSSPEN.

• Protasov, L. G. (Ed.). (2004). Tambovskaja jenciklopedija [Tambov encyclopaedia]. Yulis.

• Richmond, B. (1993). Systems thinking: Critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review, 9(2), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260090203

• Sackmann, R. (2015). How do societies cope with complex demographic challenges? A model. In R. Sackmann, W. Bartl, B. Jonda, K. Kopycka & C. Rademacher (Eds.), Coping with demographic change: A comparative view on education and local government in Germany and Poland (pp. 25-57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10301-3_3

• Smorgunov, L. V. (2012). Slozhnost’ v politike: nekotorye metodologicheskie napravlenija issledovanij [Complexity in politics: Some methodological directions of research]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, (4), 90-101. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18377548

• Verbitskaya, O. M. (2009). Rossijskaja sel’skaja sem’ja v 1897-1959 gg.: istoriko-demograficheskij aspekt [A Russian rural family in 1897–1959: Historical and demographic aspects]. Grif & K.

• Zhiromskaya, V. B., & Isupov V. A. (Eds.). (2005). Naselenie Rossii v XX veke: Istoricheskie ocherki, 1960–1979 [The population of Russia in the XX century: Historical essays, 1960–1979]. ROSSPEN.

• Zhukov, D. S., & Kanishchev, V. V. (2019). “Esli by ne bylo vojny”: modelirovanie demograficheskih processov v rossijskoj derevne 1930-1950-h godov (po materialam Tambovskoj oblasti) [‘If there was no war’: Modeling the demographic processes in Russian agrarian society in the 1930s–1950s (on the Tambov region material)]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Istorija, (3), 118-136. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41238592

• Zhukov, D. S., & Lyamin, S. K. (2016). The modeling of institutional modernization by means of fractal geometry. SAGE Open, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016640858

• Zhukov, D. S., Kanishchev, V. V., & Lyamin, S. K. (2011). Fraktal’noe modelirovanie istoriko-demograficheskih processov [Fractal modeling of historical and demographic processes]. Ineternum. http://ineternum.ru/mono1/

• Zhukov, D. S., Kanishchev, V. V., & Lyamin, S. K. (2012). Fraktal’noe modelirovanie demograficheskih processov v rossijskom agrarnom sociume (1926–1939 gg.) [Fractal modeling of demographic processes in the Russian agricultural society (1926–1939)]. Fractal Simulation, (1), 33-60. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18338705

• Zhukov, D. S., Kanishchev, V. V., & Lyamin, S. K. (2013). Fractal modeling of historical demographic processes. Historical Social Research, 38(2), 271-287. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24145486

• Zhukov, D. S., Lyamin, S. K., & Barabash, N. S. (2017). Non-linear effects of turbulent institutional modernization. Jahrbücher Für Geschichte Osteuropas, 65(4), 624-650. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44646091

• Bernstein, J. H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11(1), 137-150.

• Coey, C. (2018). International researcher mobility and knowledge transfer in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 162(2), 208-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2017.1401918

• Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). The triple helix. University – industry – government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620183

• Hayden, M., McIntosh, S., Sandoval-Hernández, A., & Thompson, J. (2020). Global citizenship: Changing student perceptions through an international curriculum. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 18(5), 589-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1816158

• Huang, Q. (2020). The pandemic and the transformation of liberal international order. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 26(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09698-0

• Jeder, D. (2014). Transdisciplinarity – the advantage of a holistic approach to life. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 137(3), 127-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.264

• Johansson, A., & Vinthagen, S. (2019). Conceptualizing ‘Everyday Resistance’: A transdisciplinary approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150154

• Knight, J. (2018). Learner agency in online task-based language learning for spoken interaction. [Doctor dissertation, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya]. https://www.tesisenred.net/handle/10803/664231#page=1

• Krestovska, N., Romandze, L., & Barabash, T. (2017). Mediation in Ukraine: Law regulation. Law Journal of Ukraine, 9(1129), 13-14.

• Lohr, K. (2018). Conflict Prevention and Management (CPM) system in transdisciplinary research collaborations: Potential and constraints [Doctor dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin]. https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/20087/dissertation_loehr_katharina.pdf?sequence=5

• Mitchell, S., Cordell, D., & Fam, D. (2015). Beginning at the end: The outcome spaces framework to guide purposive transdisciplinary research. Futures, 65(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.007

• Mokiy, V. (2017). The methodology of transdisciplinarity-4. Nalchik.

• Narovska, K. (Ed.). (2019). Basic rules of the development of professional skills of mediators (Report). http://namu.com.ua/ua/downloads/osnovni_zasady_NBNM/NAMU%20Mediation%20Basic%20Training%20-%20Recommendations%202019.pdf

• Parravicini, A. (2019). Pragmatism and emergentism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.1623

• Scholz, R. (2020). Transdisciplinarity: Science for and with society in light of the university’s roles and functions. Sustainability Science, 15(1), 1033-1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00794-x

• Simkova, I., & Saienko, N. (2019). The impact of transdisciplinarity on sight translation training in scientific and technical domains. Advanced Education, 11(3), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.164697

• Stepanova, O., Polk, M., & Saldert, H. (2020). Understanding mechanisms of conflict resolution beyond collaboration: An interdisciplinary typology of knowledge types and their integration in practice. Sustainability Science, 15(1), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00690-z

• Tang, K.-P. (2015). Communicative action and the trans-disciplinary education in Taiwan. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 6(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.22545/2015/00069

• Tsang, K. (2012). The use of midpoint on Likert scale: The implications for educational research. Hong Kong Teachers Centre Journal, 11(1), 121-130.

• Tuliakova, K. (2020). Methodology of the teaching of English professional spoken production to future specialists in the field of mediation and conflict resolution [Doctoral dissertation, Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute]. http://scc.univ.kiev.ua/abstracts_db/?PAGEN_1=3

• United Nations. (2018). United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation. (2018). https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXII-4&chapter=22&clang=_en