Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities
Pertanika Journal Home Facebook
Pertanika · Universiti Putra Malaysia Press

Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities

Official journal of Universiti Putra Malaysia for scholarly work across the social sciences, humanities and related interdisciplinary fields.

e-ISSN 2231-8534 ISSN 0128-7702
Browse latest issue Author guidelines Submit Here
Research article

Semantic Extensions of Hausa Visual and Auditory Perception Verbs gani and ji in Romance Fiction

Mohammed Sani Ya'u, Sabariah Md Rashid, Afida Mohamad Ali and Hardev Kaur Jujar Singh

Volume 31, Issue 4 December 2023 Published 13 December 2023
https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.31.4.06
KeywordsMetaphor, perception verbs, prototypical meaning, semantic extension, trans-field
Article content

Abstract

This study focuses on the metaphorical semantic extension of Hausa visual and auditory perception verbs as portrayed in romance fiction. Hausa language, just like any other language, provides a window into how speakers use language to make sense of the world around them. The study examines how language users attribute abstract concepts, such as thinking and understanding, to sensory experiences of seeing and hearing, drawing on the conceptual metaphor theory. The study analysed a corpus of Hausa romance fiction, focusing on the use of perception verbs and the metaphorical extensions they evoke. A qualitative research approach was employed, and literary texts were selected as the primary data source. The text data were extracted using the AntConc programme, and such data were then analysed using a cognitive semantics analytical framework. The study’s findings indicated that verbs of higher intellect, such as “understand” and “think”, are derived from hearing and vision, respectively. These metaphorical extensions are closely related to cultural beliefs and norms, emphasising the importance of visual and auditory cues in human relationships. This article provides insights into how language and culture intersect in using perception verbs in Hausa romance fiction texts and demonstrates the importance of understanding metaphorical extensions in studying language and culture.
Supporting literature

References

  1. Ahmad, M. (2020). Metaphorical extensions of ji, “hear” for abstract perception and gani “see” for physical perception. Yobe Journal of Language, Literature and Culture, 8(1), 126-135.
  2. Aikhenvald, A. Y., & Storch, A. (2013). Linguistic expression of perception and cognition: A typological glimpse. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & A. Storch (Eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culture (pp 1-46). BRILL Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004210127_002
  3. Aliero, M. A. (2016). Metaphorical extensions of some perception verbs in Hausa. In M. A. Aliero (Ed.), National Conference of Linguistics Association of Nigeria (p. 14). M & J Grand Orbit Communications.
  4. Almajir, T. S. (2010, November 29-December 3). An analysis of some Hausa metaphorical expressions: A cognitive semantic approach [Paper presentation]. 23rd Annual Conference of The Linguistic Association of Nigeria, Porthacourt, Nigeria. https://www.academia.edu/7782450/An_Analysis_of_Some_Hausa_Metaphorical_Expressions_A_Cognitive_Semantic_Approach
  5. Blake, R., & Sekuler, R. (2005). Perception (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Publishing.
  6. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing, 82(6), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
  7. Dagnev, I., & Chervenkova, Z. (2020). Comparative study of metaphor in literary texts and their translations. In T. V. Petkova & V. S. Chukov (Eds.), 5th International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences: Conference Proceedings (pp. 99-112). Center for Open Access in Science. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.05.09099d
  8. Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.6
  9. Dirven, R., & Pörings, R. (Eds.). (2003). Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197
  10. Evans, N., & Wilkins, D. (2000). In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Ausstralian languages. Linguistic, 76(3), 546-592. https://doi.org/10.2307/417135
  11. Farner, G. (2014). Literary fiction: The ways we read narrative literature. A&C Black.
  12. Gachũgĩ, F. G. (2018). Conceptual metaphors and perception verbs in GĨKŨYŨ. International Journal of Linguistics, 10(6), 275-290. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v10i6.13879
  13. Geurts, K. L. (2002). On rocks, walks, and talks in West Africa: Cultural categories and an anthropology of the senses. Ethos, 30(3), 178-198. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.2002.30.3.178
  14. Goldstein, E. B. (2010). Introduction to perception. In E. B. Goldstein (Ed.), Sensation and perception (pp. 3-20). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  15. Gunnarsdóttir, Á. B. (2013). Conceptual metaphors in perception verbs: A comparativ e analy sis in English and Icelandic. University of Iceland.
  16. Howes, D. (1991). The varieties of sensory experience: A sourcebook in the anthroplogy of the senses. In D. Howes (Ed.), To summon all the senses (pp. 3-21). University of Toronto.
  17. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (1999). Polysemy and metaphor in perception verbs: A cross-linguistic study [Doctoral thesis, University of Edinburgh]. Edinburgh Research Archive. https://hdl.handle.net/1842/22334
  18. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2002). Mind-as-body as a cross-linguistic conceptual metaphor. Miscelánea. Journal of English and American Studies, 25(1), 93-119.
  19. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2008). Vision metaphors for the intellect: Are they really cross-linguistic? Atlantis, 30(1), 15-33.
  20. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013a). The power of the senses and the role of culture in metaphor and language. In R. Caballero & J. E. Diaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition: Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (E)motion and Perception (pp. 109-133). Walter De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110300772.109
  21. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013b). The relationship between conceptual metaphor and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(2), 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0014
  22. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2019). Perception metaphors in cognitive linguistics: Scope, motivation, and lexicalisation. In J. S. Laura, O. Carolyn, S. R. Lila, & M. Asifa (Eds.), Perception metaphors (pp. 43-64). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.03iba
  23. Jaggar, P. J., & Buba, M. (2009). Metaphorical extensions of” eat” to [overcome] and” drink” to [undergo] in Hausa. In J. Newman (Ed.), The linguistics of eating and drinking (pp. 229-251). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.84.11jag
  24. Jumaah, R. T., Md Rashid, S., Abdul Jabar, M. A. B., & Ali, A. M. (2020). The English verb see in fiction writing: A cognitive semantic analysis. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 515-536. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.34
  25. Klaassen, M. (2015). Fiction-writing modes: Eleven essential tools for bringing your story to life. BookBaby.
  26. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphor we live by. University of Chicago Press.
  27. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by: With a new Afterword. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
  28. Leon, C. (2021). Metaphorical extensions of perception verbs in English and Croatian: A comparative analysis. University of Zagreb.
  29. Li, Z. (2013). A comparative survey of vision metaphors based on the corpus in English and Chinese. Theories and Practice in Language Studies, 3(7), 1232-1242. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.7.1232-1242
  30. Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (2011). The senses in language and culture. The Senses and Society, 6(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.2752/174589311X12893982233551
  31. Manasia, M. G. (2016). Polysemy and metaphor in the verbs of perception. In T. Corlăţean & I.-G. Rotaru (Eds.), Proceedings of Harvard Square symposium: The future of knowledge (Vol. 1, pp. 55-64). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2986466
  32. Matthen, M. (2015). The individuation of the senses. In M. Mohan (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of philosophy of perception (pp. 567-586). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.013.025
  33. Msuya, E. A. (2016). Use of metaphors in fictional narrative: A genrewise comparison of selected works by African writers. International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 5(4), 1-22.
  34. Neagu, M. (2013). What is universal and what is language specific in the polysemy of perception verbs? Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 58(3), 329-343.
  35. Popova, Y. B. (2003). ‘The fool sees with his nose’: metaphoric mappings in the sense of smell in Patrick Süskind’s Perfume. Language and Literature, 12(2), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947003012002296
  36. Raffaelli, I., & Kerovec, B. (2017). The concept of ‘taste’ in formation of Croatian and Turkish lexicon: A contrastive analysis. Suvremena Lingvistika, 43(83), 21-48.
  37. Ritchie, I. (1991). The varieties of sensory experience: A sourcebook in the anthroplogy of the senses. In D. Howes (Ed.), Fusion of the faculties: A study of the language of the senses in Hausaland (pp. 193-202). University of Toronto.
  38. Roque, L. S., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., & Majid, A. (2018). Universal meaning extensions of perception verbs are grounded in interaction. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(3), 371-406. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0034
  39. Roque, L. S., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., Dirksmeyer T., Enfield, N. J., Floyd, S., Hammond, J., Rossi, G., Tufvesson., S., Putten, S. V., & Majid, A. (2015). Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 31-60. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0089
  40. Rouby, C., Schaal, B., Dubois, D., Gervais, R., & Holley, A. (Eds.). (2002). Olfaction, taste, and cognition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546389
  41. Searle, J. R. (1978). Literal meaning. Erkenntnis, 13(1) 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160894
  42. Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge University Press.
  43. Semino, E., Demjén, Z., & Demmen, J. (2018). An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 625-645. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw028
  44. Steen, G. J., & Gibbs, R. W. (1999). Introduction. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 1-8). John Benjamins.
  45. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.01ste
  46. Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904
  47. The Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752
  48. Van Putten, S. (2020). Perception verbs and the conceptualization of the senses: The case of Avatime. Linguistics, 58(2), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0039
  49. Vanhove, M. (2008). Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions: A crosslinguistic perspective. In M. Vanhove (Ed.), From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations (pp. 341-370). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.106.17van
  50. Viberg, Å. (1983). The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics, 21(1), 123-162. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1983.21.1.123
  51. Weisser, M. (Ed.). (2016). Practical corpus linguistics: An introduction to corpus-based language analysis. John Wiley & Son Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119180180
  52. Wober, M. (1966). Sensotypes. Journal of Social Psychology, 70(2), 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1966.9712414
  53. Ya’u, M. S., Md Rashid, S., Ali, A. M., & Kaur, H. (2021). The semantic extensions of visual and auditory perception verbs in Hausa fiction writings. In S. Paramasivam & Z. I. Zainal (Eds.), Proceedings of The 11th Malaysia International Conference on Languages, Literatures and Cultures (pp. 25-29). Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
  54. Yu, N. (2004). The eyes for sight and mind. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(4), 663-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00053-5
  55. Yu, N. (2008). The relationship between metaphor, body and culture. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language and mind: Sociocultural situatedness (Vol. 2, pp. 387-407). Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199116.4.387
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License .