Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology
Pertanika Journal Home Facebook
Pertanika · Universiti Putra Malaysia Press

Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology

Official journal of Universiti Putra Malaysia for scholarly work across science, engineering and related technologies.

e-ISSN 2231-8526 ISSN 0128-7680
Research article

Modeling and Molecular Dynamics of Aquaporin from an Antarctic Pseudomonas sp. Strain AMS3

Muhairil Sulong Tuah, Wahhida Latip, Ainur Yasmin Ahmad Ridzwan, Samyuktha Balakrishnan, Raja Noor Zaliha Raja Abd. Rahman, Noor Dina Muhd Noor and Mohd Shukuri Mohamad Ali

https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.30.3.01
KeywordsAntarctica, aquaporin, homology modeling, molecular dynamics,Pseudomonas sp. AMS3, water gating
Article content

Abstract

Aquaporins, also known as water channels, are a large family of transmembrane channel proteins present throughout all life domains and are implicated in human disorders. The psychrophilic aquaporin comes to attention because of its specialty in adaptive ability to keep on functioning to maintain water homeostasis under low temperatures, which have an optimal temperature for growth at about 15ºC or lower. However, studies regarding aquaporin isolated from psychrophilic Pseudomonas sp. are still scattered. Recently, the genome sequence of an Antarctic Pseudomonas sp. strain AMS3 revealed a gene sequence encoding for a putative aquaporin designated as PAqpZ2_AMS3. In this study, structure analysis and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of a predicted model of a fully hydrated aquaporin monomer was embedded in a lipid bilayer and was performed at different temperatures for structural flexibility and stability analysis. The MD simulation results revealed that the predicted structure could remain stable and flexible at low to medium temperatures. In addition, the important position of water gating amino acids, Phe36 and Asn180 residues were rearranged in -5ºC MD simulation, leading to changes in the aquaporin water column size. The information obtained from this psychrophilic aquaporin, PAqpZ2_AMS3, provides new insights into the structural adaptation of this protein at low temperatures and could be a useful tool for low-temperature industrial applications and molecular engineering purposes in the future.
Supporting literature

References

  1. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 215(3), 403-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
  2. Aponte-Santamaría, C., Fischer, G., Båth, P., Neutze, R., & de Groot, B. L. (2017). Temperature dependence of protein-water interactions in a gated yeast aquaporin. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04180-z
  3. Araya-Secchi, R., Garate, J. A., Holmes, D. S., & Perez-Acle, T. (2011). Molecular dynamics study of the archaeal aquaporin AqpM. BioMed Central Genomics, 12(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-S4-S8
  4. Bienert, S., Waterhouse, A., de Beer, T. A., Tauriello, G., Studer, G., Bordoli, L., & Schwede, T. (2017). The SWISS-MODEL Repository-new features and functionality. Nucleic Acids Research, 45, 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1132
  5. Brezovsky, J., Chovancova, E., Gora, A., Pavelka, A., Biedermannova, L., & Damborsky, J. (2013). Software tools for identification, visualization and analysis of protein tunnels and channels. Biotechnology Advances, 31(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.02.002
  6. Brown, D. (2017). The discovery of water channels (aquaporins). Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 70(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1159/000463061
  7. Cho, C. H., Urquidi, J., Singh, S., Park, S. C., & Robinson, G. W. (2002). Pressure Effect on the density of water. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 106(33), 7557-7561. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0136260
  8. Cohen, E. (2012). Roles of aquaporins in osmoregulation, desiccation and cold hardiness in insects. Entomology, Ornithology & Herpetology, 1, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0983.S1-001
  9. Colovos, C., & Yeates, T. O. (1993). Verification of protein structures: Patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Science, 2(9), 1511-1519. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560020916
  10. De Maayer, P., Anderson, D., Cary, C., & Cowan, D. A. (2014). Some like it cold: Understanding the survival strategies of psychrophiles. European Molecular Biology Organization Reports, 15(5), 508-517. https://doi.org/10.1002/embr.201338170
  11. Donkor, E. S., Dayie, N. T., & Adiku, T. K. (2014). Bioinformatics with basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) and fast alignment (FASTA). Journal of Bioinformatics and Sequence Analysis, 6(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC2013.0086
  12. Finn, R. N., & Cerda, J. (2015). Evolution and functional diversity of aquaporins. The Biological Bulletin, 229, 6-23. https://doi.org/10.1086/BBLv229n1p6
  13. Gomes, D., Agasse, A., Thiébaud, P., Delrot, S., Gerós, H., & Chaumont, F. (2009). Aquaporins are multifunctional water and solute transporters highly divergent in living organisms. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes, 1788(6), 1213-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.03.009
  14. Goto, S. G., Lee Jr, R. E., & Denlinger, D. L. (2015). Aquaporins in the Antarctic midge, an extremophile that relies on dehydration for cold survival. The Biological Bulletin, 229(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1086/BBLv229n1p47
  15. Hedfalk, K., Törnroth-Horsefield, S., Nyblom, M., Johanson, U., Kjellbom, P., & Neutze, R. (2006). Aquaporin gating. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 16(4), 447-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2006.06.009
  16. Hospital, A., Goñi, J. R., Orozco, M., & Gelpí, J. L. (2015). Molecular dynamics simulations: Advances and applications. Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry, 8, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.2147/AABC.S70333
  17. Hub, J. S., Grubmüller, H., & De Groot, B. L. (2009). Dynamics and energetics of permeation through aquaporins. What do we learn from molecular dynamics simulations.? Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, 190, 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79885-9_3
  18. Kleywegt, G. J. (2000). Validation of protein crystal structures. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, 56(3), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444999016364
  19. Kourghi, M., Nourmohammadi, S., Pei, J. V., Qiu, J., McGaughey, S., Tyerman, S. D., Byrt, C. S., & Yool, A. J. (2017). Divalent cations regulate the ion conductance properties of diverse classes of aquaporins. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(11), Article 2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112323
  20. Kozono, D., Ding, X., Iwasaki, I., Meng, X., Kamagata, Y., Agre, P., & Kitagawa, Y. (2003). Functional expression and characterization of an archaeal aquaporin: AqpM from Methanothermobacter marburgensis. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(12), 10649-10656. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M212418200
  21. Krieger, E., & Vriend, G. (2014). YASARA view - Molecular graphics for all devices from smartphones to workstations. Bioinformatics, 30(20), 2981-2982. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu426
  22. Lind, U., Järvå, M., Alm Rosenblad, M., Pingitore, P., Karlsson, E., Wrange, A. L., Kamdal, E., Sundell, K., Andre, C., Jonsson, P. R., Havenhand, J., Eriksson, L. A., Hedfalk, K., & Blomberg, A. (2017). Analysis of aquaporins from the euryhaline barnacle Balanus improvisus reveals differential expression in response to changes in salinity. Public Library of Science One, 12(7), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181192
  23. Mannige, R. V., Kundu, J., & Whitelam, S. (2016). The Ramachandran number: An order parameter for protein geometry. Public Library of Science One, 11(8), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160023
  24. Mathai, J. C., Missner, A., Kügler, P., Saparov, S. M., Zeidel, M. L., Lee, J. K., & Pohl, P. (2009). No facilitator required for membrane transport of hydrogen sulfide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(39), 16633-16638. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902952106
  25. Németh-Cahalan, K. L., & Hall, J. E. (2000). pH and calcium regulate the water permeability of aquaporin 0. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275(10), 6777-6782. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.10.6777
  26. Sachdeva, R., & Singh, B. (2014). Insights into structural mechanisms of gating induced regulation of aquaporins. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 114(2), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.01.002
  27. Salomon‐Ferrer, R., Case, D. A., & Walker, R. C. (2013). An overview of the Amber biomolecular simulation package. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 3(2), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1121
  28. Savage, D. F., Egea, P. F., Robles-Colmenares, Y., O’Connell III, J. D., Stroud, R. M., & Simon, S. (2003). Architecture and selectivity in aquaporins: 2.5 Å X-ray structure of aquaporin Z. Public Library of Science Biology, 1(3), 334-340. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0000072
  29. Schmidt, V., & Sturgis, J. N. (2017). Making monomeric aquaporin Z by disrupting the hydrophobic tetramer interface. American Chemical Society Omega, 2, 3017-3027. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b00261
  30. Tong, H., Hu, Q., Zhu, L., & Dong, X. (2019). Prokaryotic aquaporins. Cells, 8(11), Article 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8111316
  31. Woo, J., Chae, Y. K., Jang, S. J., Kim, M. S., Baek, J. H., Park, J. C., Trink, B., Ratovitski, E., Lee, T., Park, B., Park, M., Kang, J. H., Soria, J. C., Lee, J., Califano, J., Sidransky, D., & Moon, C. (2008). Membrane trafficking of AQP5 and cAMP dependent phosphorylation in bronchial epithelium. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 366(2), 321-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.11.078
  32. Zhou, A. Q., O’Hern, C. S., & Regan, L. (2011). Revisiting the Ramachandran plot from a new angle. Protein Science, 20, 1166-1171. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.644