PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE

J

• Addis, B. (1994). The art of the structural engineer. Artemis.

• Allimant, R. D. (2009). Tiempo y cosa: La influencia de Einstein en el pensamiento de Zubiri en torno al tiempo lineal [Time and thing: Einstein’s influence on Zubiri’s thinking on linear time]. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica, 65, 809-832.

• Arenas, J. J. (1990). El sentido del diseño en ingeniería [The meaning of engineering design]. Revista de Obras Pública, 3294, 11-17.

• Arenas, J. J. (2002). Caminos en el aire: Los puentes [Paths in the air: Bridges]. Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos.

• Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge University Press.

• Ballantyne, A. (2004). Architectures: Modernism and after. Blackwell Publishing.

• Billington, D. P. (1985). The tower and the bridge. The new art of structural engineering. Princeton University Press.

• Billington, D. P. (2003). The art of structural design. A Swiss legacy (pp. 431-433). Yale University Press.

• Billington, D. P. (2006). Teaching ethics in engineering education through historical analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0021-z

• Borja-Villel, M. (n.d.). Exhibition encounters with the 30s. Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Madrid, Spain.

• Boutang, Y. M. (2011). Cognitive capitalism. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611407207

• Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, 43-53.

• Calvo-Sotelo, L. (2003). Una reflexión sobre la ingeniería y los ingenieros. [A reflection on engineering and engineers]. https://www.raing.es/discursoingreso/una-reflexion-sobre-la-ingenieria-y-los-ingenieros-al-empezar-el-siglo-xxi/

• Cappelli, P. (1999). The new deal at work. Harvard Business School Press.

• Carra, A. (2009). Algunas objeciones a Bauhaus [Some objections to the Bauhaus]. Paperback, 6, 1-11.

• Coupérie-Eiffel, P. (2012). Eiffel por Eiffel [Eiffel by Eiffel]. Plataforma Editorial.

• Crotty, M. (2012). The foundations of social research. Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203127353

• Daix, P. (2002). Historia cultural del arte moderno [Cultural history of modern art]. Ediciones Cátedra.

• Dempsey, A. (2002). Estilos, escuelas y movimientos [Styles, schools and movements]. Editorial Blume.

• Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience. Perigee.

• Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (2021). The world of goods. Routledge.

• Drucker, P. F. (2021). The age of discontinuity. Guidelines to our changing society. Heinemann.

• Einstein, A. (1979). Ideas and opinions. Rupa & Co.

• Fernández-Troyano, L. (1999). Tierra sobre el agua. Visión histórica universal de los puentes [Land over water. Universal historical overview of bridges]. Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos.

• Fernández, S. G., Kubus, R., & Pérez-Iñigo, J. M. (2019). Innovation ecosystems in the EU: Policy evolution and horizon Europe proposal case study (the Actors’ perspective). Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(17), 4735. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174735

• Forgács, É. (1997). The Bauhaus idea and Bauhaus politics. Central European University Press.

• Freeman, C., & Perez, C. (1988). Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In Technical change and economic theory (pp. 33-66). Pinter.

• Gasset, O. y. (1983). Mapa-sinopsis de su vida y obra [Map-synopsis of his life and work]. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.

• Geels, F. W. (2005). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6), 681-696.

• Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39, 495-510.

• Godard, T. (1924). Ponts er combles métalliques [Metal bridges and decks] . Société des ingénieurs civils de France et de la Société d’encouragement por l’industrie nationale.

• Goethe, J. W. (2002). Goethe y la ciencia. Siruela.

• Graw, I. (2014). ¿Cuánto vale el arte? Mercado, especulación y cultura de la celebridad [How much is art worth? Market, speculation and celebrity culture]. Mardulce.

• Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science Technology and Human Values, 27, 28-52.

• Kondratieff, N. D. (1935). The long waves in economic life. The Review of Economic Statistics, XVII, 105-115.

• Kuhn, T. (2017). The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press.

• Kumar, A. (2021). Between metis and techne: Politics, possibilities and limits of improvisation. Social & Cultural Geography, 22(6), 783-806. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1645201

• Laiglesia, J. F. de, Loeck, J., & Martín, R. C. (Eds.). (2010). La cultura transversal. Colaboraciones entre arte, ciencia y tecnología [Transversal culture. Collaborations between art, science and technology]. Universidad de Vigo.

• Lanza, C. (2007). El sentimiento del puente en la pintura moderna. Merodeando en torno a un cuadro no muy conocido de Paul Klee [The feeling of the bridge in modern painting. Lurking around a little-known painting by Paul Klee]. Revista de Obras Públicas, 3473, 37-50.

• Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. The M.I.T Press.

• Manterola, J. (2010). La obra de ingeniería como obra de arte [The engineering work as a work of art]. Fundación Arquitectura y Sociedad Laetoli.

• Milicua, J. (1994). Historia universal del arte- Arte s-XX-VV-IX [Universal history of art- Arte s-XX-VV-IX]. Editorial Planeta.

• Mulgan, G. (2018). Big mind. How collective intelligence can change our world. Princeton University Press.

• Perrow, M. R., & Davy, A. J. (2008). Handbook of ecological restoration: Principles of restoration (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.

• Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science 1, 14, 399-441.

• Potts, J. (2009). Art and innovation: An evolutionary view of the creative industries. Innovation Management, Policy & Practice, 11, 138-147.

• Preckler, A. M. (2003). Historia del arte universal de los siglos XIX y XX [History of universal art of the 19th and 20th centuries]. Editorial Complutense.

• Rice, P. (1994). An engineer imagines. Ellipsis.

• Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. Human Choice and Climate Change, 2, 327-399.

• Rosado-García, M. J. (2022). When engineering is art: The meaningful value. Revista Ingeniería de Construcción, 37(2), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.7764/ric.00026.21

• Rosado-García, M. J., Kubus, R., Argüelles-bustillo, R., & García-García, M. J. (2021). A new European Bauhaus for a culture of transversality and sustainability. Sustainability, 11844, 1-22. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.3390/su132111844

• Ruiz, C. (2010). Salvador Dalí y la ciencia, más allá de una simple curiosidad [Salvador Dalí and science, beyond mere curiosity]. Pasaje a La Ciencia, 13, 1-13.

• Sanz-Balduz, L. J. (2004). The structural grail. Revista de Obras Públicas, 3444, 35-48.

• Schlaich, J. (2001, September 2-5). Variety in bridge design. 4th Symposium on Strait Crossing, Bergen, Norway.

• Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung [Theory of economic development]. Duncker & Humblot.

• Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state. How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/27.1.96

• Torroja, E. (2010). Razón y Ser de los tipos estructurales [Reason and being of the structural types]. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.

• VV.AA. (2001). Diccionarios Oxford-complutense: Arte del Siglo XX [Oxford-complutense dictionaries: 20th century art]. Editorial Complutense.

• Winner, L. (1993). Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 18, 362-378.